Political expediency cannot defeat the fundamental laws of physics and chemistry. If we continue to change the atmosphere with greenhouse gases, the world will continue to warm, extreme weather and fire events will become increasingly normal, and humans and other life forms will suffer, greatly. Professor Euan Ritchie argues that what’s needed, more than anything else, is honesty.

The great divide between evidence-based research and government policy is complex. Scientists have been calling on governments to address anthropogenic climate change for decades, seeking policies that align with their research findings, but there has been no rush to respond and, unfortunately, climate change is not the only example of this. So why, despite scientific evidence, does so little translate into policy and action?

The Australian government recently released a new National Science Statement, aiming to shape “science policy and leadership across governments, in our labs, in research institutions and in boardrooms”. Don Williams critically assesses the Statement, locating positive elements and potential risks, and examining links to the broader policy agenda.

The intrinsic mismatch between curiosity-led scientific work with a policy agenda focused on reducing financial costs through commercial forces leads to disregard for scientific information, system fragmentation, increased complexity, and the atomisation of accountability as common consequences of introducing competition to previously unified systems.

Despite strict biosecurity laws and protocols, Varroa destructor breached Australian borders in June of 2022, threatening a $14B industry. By September 2023 the Australian Federal Government announced they were abandoning their eradication strategy, turning instead to management. Now, the parasitic varroa mite has broken through into Victoria’s ecosystems too.